Group 2
Stan De Caju, Sien Beckers, Nathalie Verhaert, Jade Gevaerts, Waso Vanden Broeck, Lola, Clara Bosquet
Results ideation session Group 2
July 2022
‘Agree to disagree… together’
The two days of understanding, agreeing and differing with our group at LaMouseion were characterized by differences. As we started to think the unthinkable around the concept of generosity we bumped into a very broad spectrum or rather forms of understanding. The concept of generosity is in its natural form subjective. Every context of generosity is everytime a context, which means that generosity is a context-sensitive matter. In our understanding of the concept we agree to disagree. To visualize our disagreement we challenged ourselves to find a somewhat definition of our personal understanding. Lower in this portfolio you find them written down. Surprisingly the definitions all together, as a bundle of seven, made us reconsider our disagreement on the matter since we found a common base in them.
Feedback Transdisciplinary Team
In the written text, the participants of Group 2 did not reach a consensus on one general definition of generosity. They decided to cast their different definitions of generosity into characters and to create a play. In this visual imagery, the transdisciplinary team discovered a wealth of messages and symbolism. The accompanying text simultaneously brings a strong theoretical framework and could potentially serve as a basis for all other groups of TUE, chapter II. As part of the Chapter Generosity transdisciplinary team, artist Koen Vanmechelen selected two artworks: Legacy & New Generation to integrate the ideations of group 2 with the feedback and reflections of the transdisciplinary team.
Impressions Group 2
Back to Chapter Generosity homepage